Friday, April 02, 2010

Richard Nixon: Bad President!

January 20, 1969 – August 9, 1974, almost two terms

In terms of the Worst U.S. Presidents in history, for a long time in my estimation, Nixon was the one. He was elected President when I was twelve years old. My parents were big Nixon fans, which at the time I just accepted without judgment or opinion, because Presidents were not the stuff of children. I became more and more aware of the outcry against Nixon, because I read the paper every day and watched All In The Family, but I had no reason or stimulus to have an opinion different than my parents yet. It wasn’t until I was a High School freshman, with Nixon still occupying the Oval Office, that I found myself in a U.S. History class with a young firebrand teacher who did have an opinion and wasn’t shy about sharing it. Every day Mr. Coleco would give a spirited lecture about some aspect of U.S. History, both from the distant dusty past and the confusing present. He made it clear to those of us listening exactly what was going on in Washington with the Watergate Scandal and the Hearings. I liked Mr. Coleco, because he talked to us as if we were adults, and he had a sense of humor, so suddenly I had an opinion about Nixon: he was a crook!

When Nixon resigned the White House in disgrace in August of ’74, my family was on an East Coast vacation. The day he made his farewell speech we were staying in a hotel in Erie, Pennsylvania. "Therefore, I shall resign the Presidency effective at noon tomorrow...” Even through the crushing shame and disappointment that my parents were feeling, as well as what felt to me like the epic historical implications of the event, inwardly I was celebrating it as a victory for Democracy, or at least what I understood of it from listening to Mr. Coleco. For years afterward I thought of Nixon as a Bad President – certainly the worst I had experienced, an opinion I clung to even during the baffling years of Reagan, and was unshaken until W. subjected us to eight years of his scabrous, lawbreaking, condescending, intellectually challenged, train wreck of a presidency. I still get slightly queasy thinking about what he and his rat fink buddies did to this country.

Nowadays, with the softening of intervening years, it’s clear to me that one can, but shouldn’t judge Nixon’s presidency solely based on the power crazed behavior of his that led to Watergate. He actually achieved a great deal, for a crook – and a Republican crook at that! There are some historians who, whether they think Nixon was a “Good” President or a “Bad” President, believe he was one of the greatest Presidents of the 2oth Century, and you can’t dispute that, unlike many of the mooks on my list, he certainly did a lot, “good” and “bad”.

The stuff you could praise: Nixon opened the giant doors of diplomacy and trade with China – a stunning feat for the period, and he worked with the Soviets to craft the first Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty and the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty and initiate détente – even more amazing because Nixon had historically been so virulently anti-communist and all. (He once referred to Helen Gahagan Douglas, his opponent during the contentious 1950 Senate race as “Pink right down to her underwear”, apparently unaware of the inadvertent genital impression it evoked. Douglas retaliated by referring to Nixon as “Tricky Dick”, apparently intentionally utilizing the genital innuendo. Atta girl!) He eventually got us out of Vietnam and brought American troops home from Southeast Asia. He increased Social Security spending, advocated affirmative action programs for racial minorities, launched a broad environmental initiative, ended conscription (one year before I would have been eligible for the draft – Thank You Tricky Dick!), and was surprisingly progressive in his approach to handling inflation and unemployment.

Why else would Noam Chomsky himself remark that, in some respects, Nixon was "the last liberal president."? At his non-power drunk core, Nixon believed in using government wisely to benefit all and actually supported the idea of practical liberalism.

The stuff, aside from Watergate, that wasn’t so good: Nixon dealt too harshly with anti-war protesters while he approved and then expanded a covert bombing campaign in Cambodia, (some 20,000 American soldiers died while Nixon was in office, not to mention countless Southeast Asians) appointed several conservative Supreme Court judges, cut funds to NASA programs (we coulda had a base on the MOON!), and one has to say, on the uber-negative side, he could be considered one of the chief architects of the modern Republican party.

In spite of the self-rehabilitation efforts Nixon undertook in the years after his disgrace and resignation, the predominant historical image (and certainly my own) of Nixon was negative. He had made a lot of enemies during his political career, and politicians have long memories. Here are two quotes about Nixon from Democratic leaders from different generations:

"Richard Nixon is a no-good lying bastard. He can lie out of both sides of his mouth at the same time, and if he ever caught himself telling the truth, he'd lie just to keep his hand in." Harry S Truman

Ouch! (No disrespect intended, but when I read that quote, I try to hear it in Truman’s voice, which to me always sounded a lot like a cross between Pat Paulsen and Elmer Fudd)

"In 200 years of history, he's the most dishonest president we've ever had. I think he's disgraced the presidency." Jimmy Carter

(Now there are some who would argue that Carter was so ineffective as President that he would have no right to criticize. But Carter was above all, an honest man, a moral man – two traits he held as important attributes for a politician. While realizing that Carter was ultimately not a very good President, I like and respect him, and the added fact that he was also someone who knew history, and took it’s lessons seriously would cause me to believe his assessment of Nixon.)

So ultimately Nixon, like all “Bad” Presidents, is a bit of a mixed bag. This entire exercise has been a clear indication of the importance of embracing the Gray. Very little in the world, or indeed in history, is black or white. It’s the nuances in the vast middle Gray that make it so interesting.

Fun Facts: As a student, Nixon was known as Gloomy Gus. A great synonym for that is “Picklepuss”, which personally I think is more applicable here.

Nixon was the first president to visit all 50 states. Apropos of nothing, much like the Fun Fact that Nixon’s second Secretary of Agriculture was Earl Butz. Huh huh! “Butz”

Nixon was in Dallas on the day that John F Kennedy was shot. Conspiracy theorists: discuss.

And, most awesome of all: In 1970, Elvis Presley, more than likely fairly buzzed on painkillers, visited the White House to talk about drugs – and gave Nixon a gold revolver as a gift a gun which he somehow had managed to get past the Secret Service detail that guarded the President.


B. James said...

I am doing a research project on Nixon's negative side. Watergate Scandal is one of his major negative actions. However, what other major negative actions did he make so that we can consider him an actual "bad" president?

Jim Pearson said...

As I said in my post, it is a decision, for the most part, left up to each person. I used to think he was "Bad" through and through, but as with most everything else in life and history, the story of Nixon is told not in black and white, but in many subtly nuanced shades of gray. I like the way the Independent (a UK news service) puts it:
"Opinion remains divided as to whether his was a successful presidency ruined by a single fatal flaw; or whether his resignation actually created a misleadingly positive impression of his achievements, by leaving his successor to sort out the problems that were building up in the economy. The fairest verdict can probably be found in Jimmy Carter's words: 'He's disgraced the presidency.' "
One could say that what ultimately puts Nixon in the "Bad" category was that he thought he was always right, in spite of what his advisors sometimes told him, and in spite of what might be best for the American People, the ones who put him in office. It was certainly an epic fail on the part of a very powerful, and somewhat power crazy man installed in the highest office our country has.
Thanks for asking my opinion!

Anonymous said...

girls [url=]gay men cocks video free[/url]

Cookie Monster said...

Hi Jim, we cant be out of bad presidents, can we? :P

This probably isn't the place to ask this, but are there any internship opportunities over there at Playdom?

Anonymous said...

I'm here to speak to you [B][URL=]insanity[/URL][/B] about a muscles developing eating habits that may allow you to [B][URL=]p90x reviews[/URL][/B] place on much more muscles. Most individuals feel how the magic happens inside the health club, but the fact is that your muscles won't develop unless your diet regime permits them to develop. Your diet regime is what provides the nutrients to feed individuals muscles as they grow and without having the correct food,[B]insanity reviews[/B] they are just not going to grow. Doing your hourly training is not enough simply because once you leave the gymnasium, you have to care for those muscle groups the rest of the time. [B][URL=]p90x reviews[/URL][/B] Inside the gymnasium, you operate difficult. Outside the health club, you consume right. I'm planning to [B][URL=]p90x reviews[/URL][/B] demonstrate you precisely what a muscle creating diet need to appear like.


Anonymous said...

[B][URL=]Thomas Sabo[/URL][/B] [B]Thomas Sabo[/B] [U]Thomas Sabo[/U] [B]masai barefoot[/B] [U]mbt schuhe[/U] [B][URL=]mtb masai[/URL][/B]

[B]Thomas Sabo charms[/B] [B][URL=]Thomas Sabo charms[/URL][/B] [U]Thomas Sabo schmuck[/U] abercormbie fitch [B]mbt schuhe[/B] [B][URL=]mtb schuhe masai[/URL][/B] [U]swiss masai[/U] vibram five fingers Performa [B]Thomas Sabo charms[/B] [B][URL=]Thomas Sabo onlineshop[/URL][/B] [U]Thomas Sabo onlineshop[/U] masai barefoot [B]fivefingers[/B] [B][URL=]vibram five fingers[/URL][/B] [U]vibram[/U] Thomas Sabo charms [B]abercrombie and fitch[/B] [B][URL=]abercrombie and fitch[/URL][/B] [U]abercormbie fitch[/U]

[B]abercrombie and fitch[/B] [U]abercrombie and fitch[/U] [B][URL=]abercormbie & fitch[/URL][/B] [B][URL=]mtb masai[/URL][/B] [B]swiss masai[/B] [U]swiss masai[/U] [B][URL=]Thomas Sabo onlineshop[/URL][/B] [B]Thomas Sabo[/B] [U]Thomas Sabo[/U] [B]masai shoes[/B] [U]mbt[/U] [B][URL=]masai schuhe[/URL][/B]

Anonymous said...

These online sports betting become widely patronized especially among the global masses. Since the globe contains a huge number of masses compared to the other two social statuses, the online sports betting is pouring a lot of money compared to Las Vegas - the betting capital of the world. [url=]bet online[/url] [url=]bet online[/url] [url=]bet online[/url] [url=]apuestas[/url] [url=]jouer en ligne[/url] [url=]bet online[/url] [url=]bet online[/url] [url=]bet online[/url] [url=]bet online[/url] [url=]bet online[/url] [url=]bet online[/url] [url=]bet online[/url] [url=]bet online[/url] [url=]bet online[/url] [url=]bet online[/url] The line shows that San Diego is -3, with a total of 44-points. The reason why there is a line is because one team is going to be favored over another to win the game. This way the oddsmakers can level the playing field, making the bet attractive to both sides. In this case San Diego is the favorite and New England is the underdog. This means that if you are placing your bet on San Diego, the Chargers will have to beat the Patriots by at least 3 points for you to win the bet. If they lose the game or win by less than 3, you lose your bet. The second number shows 44, which is the over/under score. By betting the over, you are putting money on the possibility that the sum of both team’s score will be greater than 44-points at the end of the game.

P90x Workout Program said...

It is rather interesting for me to read the post. Thanks for it. I like such themes and anything that is connected to this matter. I definitely want to read more soon. Thanks.

Anonymous said...

Back in the day we didn't have much to compare bad presidents to... other than Johnson, who was only mildly bad. Dick personified the "Dark Side" and made LBJ look good. I remember painting a oil portrait of Nixon in '74 and using it in my portfolio that I submitted to the Academy of Art for a summer scholarship the following year. (Remember, they used to pass those half-tuition scholarships out to anybody who could pick there nose and wipe?) Anyway, afterwards I glued it to a cork backing and used it as a dart board until there was nothing left but chunks of cork poking out of the middle of his face. Yup, still hate Nixon. But they all look resplendent next to the "Bushwacker."